Experts Question Speed Of Westerfield Trial
Usual Defense Strategy Would Be To Stall
POSTED: 4:27 p.m. PDT May 20, 2002
UPDATED: 5:08 p.m. PDT May 20, 2002
SAN DIEGO -- The speed with which the David Westerfield trial is proceeding is highly unusual, and the source of a good deal of speculation, 10News reported.
Westerfield has right to be tried within 60 days of arraignment, but most of the time that right is waived to give defense attorneys more time to prepare, legal experts said.
Conventional wisdom says to utilize whatever delays are available -- allowing memories to fade and public outrage to die down -- but Westerfield's trial is moving full speed ahead, at least to this point.
With the pre-trial motions complete, jury selection began Friday. Over 600 potential jurors were initially called, to find the dozen that will hear evidence against the 50-year-old Sabre Springs engineer accused of the kidnapping and murdering of his neighbor, 7-year-old Danielle van Dam.
Danielle was last seen Feb. 1, and Westerfield was arrested three weeks later. Danielle's body was found a few days after that.
The fact that the trial has already begun is surprising many other attorneys and law professors, 10News reported.
"We saw the prosecution's case at preliminary hearing. It seems witnesses, evidence, momentum favor prosecution. I don't know why defense attorneys want it this quick," said David Steinberg, of the Thomas Jefferson School of Law.
One theory, Steinberg said, is that the defense wants to take advantage of the public backlash against the kidnapped girl's parents.
"Certainly, it could be part of the reason, to point the finger at the parents," he said.
Attorney Milt Silverman sat in with 10News during the preliminary hearing and said that one reason the defense is moving quickly is because more evidence may be out there somewhere.
"One possible hypothetical reason, he is concerned additional evidence may be uncovered as time passes," Silverman said.
The jury selection process is expected to resume May 28 in Judge William Mudd's courtroom.
Groups of 20 prospective jurors would then be questioned by the judge, prosecutors Jeff Dusek and George "Woody" Clarke and defense attorneys Steven Feldman and Robert Boyce.
![]() WESTERFIELD TRIAL DANIELLE VAN DAM 1994-2002 E-mail: daniellevandam @yahoo.com Send mail to: P.O. Box 501515 San Diego, 92150 |
Previous Stories:
- May 17, 2002: Court To Interview 262 Potential Jurors
- May 17, 2002: Westerfield Jury Selection Under Way
- May 16, 2002: Westerfield Jury Selection Set To Begin
- May 15, 2002: Judge May Make Rulings In Westerfield Case
- May 13, 2002: Westerfield Pre-Trial Still Closed
- May 10, 2002: Westerfield Trial: Pretrial Motions Remain Closed
- May 8, 2002: Reporters Called In Westerfield Trial
- May 8, 2002: DA: Danielle Was Suffocated By Westerfield
- May 7, 2002: Pretrial Motions Start In Westerfield Case
- May 2, 2002: Westerfield Pretrial Motions To Remain Sealed
- May 1, 2002: Court: Westerfield Affidavits To Remain Sealed
- April 25, 2002: DA To Seek Death Penalty Against Westerfield
- April 19, 2002: Westerfield Given Limited Access To Police Records
- April 18, 2002: Press Kept Out Of Van Dam Murder Case
- April 18, 2002: Judge Reviews Cops' Files In Van Dam Murder Case
- April 17, 2002: Westerfield Fights To Keep Search Warrants Sealed
- April 15, 2002: DA: Deny Westerfield Access To Police Records
- April 12, 2002: Lie-Detector Specialist: Westerfield 'Deceptive'
- April 11, 2002: Documents: Dogs Alerted Police To Westerfield
- April 11, 2002: No Live Press For Westerfield Pretrial Hearings
- April 4, 2002: Westerfield Lawyer: Client Abused By Police
- March 28, 2002: Trial Date Set For Van Dam Murder Case
- March 28, 2002: Westerfield To Make Court Appearance
- March 15, 2002: Westerfield To Stand Trial In Van Dam Murder
- March 13, 2002: Westerfield Hearing Takes A Break
- March 12, 2002: Testimony: Police Find Porn On Westerfield's Computer
- March 11, 2002: Witness: Danielle's Body Found Nude, Decomposing
- March 8, 2002: Gag Order Issued In Van Dam Murder Case
- March 7, 2002: Police Acted Inappropriately Toward Westerfield
- March 4, 2002: Westerfield Affidavits To Remain Sealed
- February 27, 2002: Search Warrants Show Police Sought Child Porn
- February 27, 2002: Danielle's Parents Respond To Neighbor's Arraignment
- February 26, 2002: Van Dam Neighbor To Be Arraigned
- February 26, 2002: Westerfield To Be Charged With Murder
- February 25, 2002: Danielle's Blood Found On Neighbor's Clothing
- February 14, 2002: Police Search Neighbor's House Again
- February 8, 2002: Police: Westerfield Had Child Porn
- February 8, 2002: Investigation Operations Base Leaves North County
- February 8, 2002: Search For Danielle Goes Nationwide
- February 5, 2002: Police Question Neighbor In Missing Girl Case
Copyright 2003 by TheSanDiegoChannel.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.









